There was a lot of hate for Michael Vick when the news first broke out about his involvement with dog fighting. This interview made viewers understand what Vick went through after his time in jail.
The show used a lot of closeup shots of Vick to show the emotions that he was going through when talking about the operation that he a part of. The show in a way showed what Vick was going through but it made viewers like me, somewhat not feel bad for Vick having to lose his fortune and his career of what he did to the dogs.
Halfway through the show the camera shows 3 people sitting in front of the camera, this is when the show starts to get interesting and makes the show more appealing to watch. They interview each individual with closeup shots of them sparking an interest in hearing what they have to say about the situation and Vick. The show helped viewers and fans understand what Vick went through and how he is extremely sorry of what he did.
Your three new entries are just okay. The comments about bugs are mostly about how gross they are. You didn't comment of how effective the film was (or not). Try to get beyond the reaction that you have and analyze the work more critically. Do you like what you saw, why? Why not? How did the filmmaker use filming techniques to tell the story? etc.
ReplyDelete2.75/3.75